Topics in this edition of the PHR Mailbag include the state of Detroit’s back end, the potential for a Florida winger to be offer-sheeted, and more. If your question doesn’t appear here, check back in our last two mailbag columns.
letsgonats: Q I asked in the goalie trade market (or lack thereof)- Do teams ever try to poach AHL talent stuck behind NHL goalies that are set for a while/unmovable contract? I know the Sharks got Askarov from the Predators but are there other examples? You note the goalie FA market is very weak so does it have to be a creative trade? Anyone from KHL that could come over? Zach Fucale?
There aren’t really other recent examples of a trade like Yaroslav Askarov’s. First, it’s rare that a first-round goalie gets moved that soon after being drafted. It’s similarly rare that a deal will effectively cough up two first-round assets to get a goalie given that until recently, goalies didn’t generally yield that much of a return.
But in terms of a team trying to poach an AHL goalie, that’s a little more common for varying reasons. With Boston having Jeremy Swayman and Linus Ullmark, Calgary came in and made a move to get Daniel Vladar who, to that point, had primarily played in the minors. Joey Daccord was an AHLer with Ottawa, got picked in expansion by Seattle, and is now their starter. Others have been claimed off waivers (Anton Forsberg, Eric Comrie, and Spencer Martin among the relatively recent pickups) that would also qualify simply as a team wanting to take a look at a goalie who they think could become a second-stringer.
I don’t anticipate the trade market for goalies being overly busy simply because there aren’t a lot of teams who are going to be looking for a netminder. This might be the summer that John Gibson moves and with a $6.4MM price tag, making that work could qualify as having to get creative, I suppose? But looking at the top goalies in the AHL this year, I don’t see a lot of options that teams are going to view as a possibility as a viable backup that they’re going to want to trade for. One or two could be viewed as a waiver claim but that’s about it.
In terms of international goalies, sure, Fucale could look to come back. A while back there was even some speculation about the possibility. But is there a team where he could be the sure-fire backup? Unless it’s a team like Tampa Bay sticking with insisting their backup makes the minimum salary, probably not. As for other KHL goalies who could come over, Denis Kostin could be one to keep an eye on. He’s a late bloomer (he’s already 29) but was one of the top netminders in that league this season. Perhaps that gets him a look?
rule78.1: You’re Steve Yzerman. You have Chiarot/Gustafsson/Holl under contract for next year at over $10M, and little chance of making the playoffs this season. You have let go of Hronek/Walman/Maatta/Gostisbehere.
Do you stay with what you got or do you try and unload a couple of contracts and work to improve your defense for next season?
Patience has been one of Yzerman’s hallmarks but I don’t think he can be patient this summer. The top teams in the Atlantic Division are still going to be strong, Ottawa has taken a step forward this year, and even Montreal might have passed them in terms of playoff readiness, an outcome few would have expected coming into the season. They’re going to need to do something to shore up their roster and the back end is a good place to start.
But how much do they really have to subtract from that defense group in order to add to it? They have nearly $23MM in cap room for next season, per PuckPedia, with Patrick Kane being the only UFA of note. They easily have enough space to re-sign or replace him, add another forward, and still have something left to spend on the back end without necessarily having to shed any money.
Let’s look at Erik Gustafsson first. If they bought out the final year of his contract, they’d have a $667K cap hit for two years. But if they just waived and assigned him to the minors, they’d carry a cap charge of $825K next season and nothing after that. For a difference of roughly $158K next season, they might as well hold onto him, assuming they can’t find a taker for him.
As for Ben Chiarot, I think in the right role, he can still be useful for this team. That role isn’t playing 21 minutes a night, however. I also think that with 50% retention, he could yield a small asset in a trade. My inclination would be to keep him, however, as their left-side depth is awfully thin and even if a lefty is brought in to play big minutes, I feel that he’d be better served being overpaid in a limited role over them moving him.
Justin Holl, on the other hand, feels like a legitimate buyout candidate. He’d have a $1.133MM cap charge for two years while if he was in the minors as he was to start this season, it’d be $2.225MM. For a million in savings to help this team win now (well, next season), that could be money well spent. Alternatively, those savings could be used on Axel Sandin-Pellikka if he’s deemed ready for a full-time role. That might not be their preferred route but there should be a bit more desperation coming from Detroit next season.
Red Wings: How worried should the Panthers be about a team throwing an offer sheet to Samoskevich? He has played really well this year, and the Panthers will be tight with the cap depending on whether they re-sign Ekblad and/or Bennett.
I’ve said before that I don’t think offer sheets are going to be overly prevalent this summer. The big jump in the salary cap means that most teams will have a bigger cushion to try to match. But if there are going to be offer sheets, I think it will be on short-term bridge deals similar to what St. Louis did for Dylan Holloway and Philip Broberg. And yes, Samoskevich falls into that class of player.
You can never say never and Florida would be a reasonable team to try to target, especially if they re-sign both key UFAs. I don’t think they will, mind you, but one (Sam Bennett would be my guess) is doable. That would leave them with probably around $10MM or so to work with and four or five players to sign. If they went cheap with the end-of-roster pieces, they’d be well-positioned to match most offers in the first-round pick and third-round pick compensation range (more than $4.58MM to $6.87MM last summer; those will be higher this time). And to be honest, I don’t think there’s a team willing to go that high for him.
As long as Florida doesn’t do like Edmonton did last summer and spend their way into forcing a lowball offer, they should be safe with Samoskevich. Florida is pretty good at taking care of its young players over time and Samoskevich and his camp should see that. He’s probably heading for a bridge deal but a long-term pact after that should happen if things go well. But if the Panthers spend their way into making a cheap one-year offer, then perhaps someone might try to jump in at the high end of the second-round compensation range ($4.58MM last year, a bit higher this summer) to see if that’ll do it. I expect GM Bill Zito will leave himself some wiggle room to hedge against that happening, however.
DevilShark: Any ideas on good LW UFA or trade targets for the Devils this offseason? Much talk about C depth but outside Bratt LW scoring is just about non-existent…
Nikolaj Ehlers is the top free agent option out there should he not work out an extension with the Jets. The 29-year-old has been injury-prone over his career but has surpassed the 20-goal mark in eight of his ten NHL seasons despite largely playing on the second line. With Jesper Bratt on that top unit, Ehlers could conceivably play the same role with New Jersey that he has in Winnipeg, providing some reason for optimism that he could be a very good fit.
Unfortunately, pickings get slim after that. I don’t think Taylor Hall is a viable option for them (and it seems like he’s likely to re-sign in Carolina anyway). There are some third-line pieces out there but if you’re looking for more of a needle-mover, you’re going to have to take a gamble on someone.
Two names come to mind in that category. The first is Colorado’s Jonathan Drouin. When healthy, he has been an impactful player for them. But is that because he has turned a corner or because everyone puts up points with Nathan MacKinnon? His market wasn’t the greatest last summer, resulting in him opting to re-sign and now with the injuries he’s had this year, I can’t see things drastically changing, barring a stellar playoff run. If the Devils think he can be a top-six piece away from MacKinnon, he should be gettable. The other is Andrei Kuzmenko. Yes, things didn’t go well for him in his second year in Vancouver or with Calgary this season but since being moved the first time, he has six goals and nine assists in 22 games, solid secondary scoring numbers. With how things have gone the last couple of years, he’s likely only going to want another short-term deal which could make him a low-risk addition with a bit of upside.
On the trade front, the first name that comes to mind doesn’t seem likely. We know Chris Kreider’s name had been out there in trade talks for a while and he’d be a decent fit for New Jersey. But would the Rangers send him to one of their top rivals (assuming the Devils aren’t on his partial no-trade list)? I could see the Devils being among the teams kicking the tires on Trevor Zegras with an eye on making him a winger but the acquisition price will be fairly steep. I’ll give you an under-the-radar option as well, Toronto’s Nick Robertson. He’s a decent scorer in limited minutes but hasn’t been able to crack a full-time spot in a lineup slot that suits his skill set. He still doesn’t seem like a long-term fit for them so if Tom Fitzgerald wants to try a smaller-scale move, he’s someone I’d keep an eye on.
sovietcanuckistanian: Do the Bruins continue the (arguably long overdue) retool next year? It seems they need to find – at a minimum – a middle-pairing defender; middle-six scoring depth; and whether Sacco is the right voice behind the bench. Sweeney has been very hit-and-miss with free agent signings… so naturally as a Bruins fan, I’m skeptical they will achieve what they want by the moves made this year. Your insight and opinions are always appreciated.
The trade deadline teardown in Boston didn’t feel like a short-term retool with an eye on building back up over the offseason. This was a team that looked like they were a few players away before they started to sell and now they’re even more players away. While they have ample cap space – more than $28MM, per PuckPedia – they have half a roster to spend that money on, meaning that they don’t have the ability to add several pricey impact pieces via free agency or trade. Accordingly, aiming for a quick turnaround doesn’t make sense.
That said, I don’t anticipate that management and ownership have the appetite for a longer-term, larger-scale rebuild either. I think it was notable that some of their pickups at the deadline were players that were NHL-ready or close to it (such as Marat Khusnutdinov and Fraser Minten); they might only need a year or two to become contributors. In a perfect world, they fill some of that middle-six scoring depth you referenced.
That’s more the timeline I think they’re aiming for, take a step back for a couple of years, replenish the prospect pool, and make their salary cap situation a little cleaner so that they’ll be better positioned to try to make some splashes and add back some pieces. Given the state of their prospect pool pre-deadline, there’s a case to be made that a longer-term rebuild is needed but I just don’t see them willingly committing to that.
On your other points, I don’t think they’ll do much defensively this summer. Charlie McAvoy, Hampus Lindholm, and Nikita Zadorov aren’t going anywhere. Andrew Peeke has another year left and Mason Lohrei is sure to be re-signed. That’s five spots filled right there and I could even see them keeping Henri Jokiharju at the right price. That’s a good enough short-term nucleus if the intention is to take a step back for next season. If there’s a long-term piece they like that wants to come to a losing team for a bit, maybe they try to make a splash in free agency but that feels a bit early for where they are.
As for Joe Sacco, I’d be surprised if the interim tag was lifted and he became the full-fledged head coach but returning as a lead assistant is definitely possible. But seeing just how poorly they’re playing since the deadline suggests to me that they’re going to want a new voice in there.
Photo courtesy of Terrance Lee-Imagn Images.
Definitely gonna ask this for the next mailbag, but would love other readers’ feedback… What the hell does Columbus do about their goalie situation? Neither Merlikins nor Tarasov have shown they can carry the load as NHL starters (or even backups, arguably), and the goalie market is BLEAK. What do they do here?
Greaves has shown flashes of brilliance, but I don’t know if he’s ready for prime time.
I think the CBJ need to shore up their D before making a decision on where to go in net. They have a couple D prospects that may change things in a year or 2, and a G or 2 in the system with promise. And give them a year or so to let their operations department figure out what they’re working with and they may be on the right path. I think they need to be in a bit of a holding pattern for a year or so and then can figure out where to go.