Topics in this edition of the PHR Mailbag include an assessment of Kyle Davidson as GM of the Blackhawks, the backup goalie situation in St. Louis, and more. If your question doesn’t appear here, check back in our last mailbag while we have one more coming from our most recent call for questions as well.
Unclemike1526: What is your evaluation of Kyle Davidson? I think he’s done a fine job of acquiring talent while taking some shots at veterans to try and catch lightning in a bottle to maybe make the playoffs. None of those contracts are bad enough to block anybody important. Moving off Jones and Mrazek was a stroke of genius IMO. This seems to be the year where some serious talent arrives at the end and they move up. Moore, Rinzel, Thompson should be here soon. However, where he has been lacking is picking the right coach to blend the young and the old. If his next coach pick fails, is he in trouble? I feel this is a crucial decision for him AND the team. Your thoughts? Thanks as always.
I’m not sure about their veteran additions being geared toward trying to catch lightning in a bottle for a playoff push. I think it was more culture additions – especially in the 2023 summer – and then last summer, trying to add pieces to raise the floor of their forward group and push some younger players into bigger roles in Rockford. I don’t have a problem with that strategy either, although some of the short-term contracts are pretty steep overpays. Granted, with their cap space, they can easily afford it.
Circling back to the first part of the question, I think the macro-level view is positive. Davidson has brought in several quality prospects and landed what they hope is a franchise player in Connor Bedard. Their cap situation is about as clean as anyone’s and they have plenty of draft picks to fill the cupboards moving forward. That’s all great.
Looking at the micro-level view, it’s not as great. Some good deadline dealing aside, some of the veterans brought in haven’t had the desired impact in terms of raising the floor and insulating the young talent. This year has been ugly from a win-loss perspective and in some cases, a development perspective which is the last thing you want in a rebuilding year. It hasn’t mattered who’s coaching this group, neither Luke Richardson nor Anders Sorensen could get enough out of them. While the longer-term objectives are getting hit (a high draft pick this June, development at lower levels for the younger prospects), how this season has gone takes a bit of the shine off the longer-term positives.
The general belief is that GMs get three coaches and then things start to get shaky. And in this case, whoever is hired to coach next season would be number three. But with Sorensen being an interim in-season promotion, I don’t think that will count against Davidson. Most coaching targets aren’t available midseason so you do what you can with who you have and go from there. So, in my mind, whoever is coaching next season will be the second hire. As long as Chicago starts to show some more progress under that bench boss next season, I think Davidson will be fine for a little while yet.
Zakis: Read that some Hawks fans want Bedard run out of town due to regression and some silly penalties recently. First, what are they thinking? And two, in the nonzero chance they think about moving him (0%), what would the return look like?
I was baffled seeing some trying to correlate a couple of misconduct penalties to a desire to leave when it comes to Connor Bedard. And it’s more baffling to think some would want him run out of town already; I can’t come up with a logical reason for someone to have that mindset. He’s still a junior-aged player, anchoring a team that frankly isn’t very good. If you look back at some of the teenagers who had strong second seasons, their supporting cast was a lot better than Bedard has had.
Saying that doesn’t absolve him from any blame by any stretch either. I expected he’d take a step forward development-wise this season and he hasn’t. But I still think he’s going to be a legitimate star center in this league and those are players you don’t give up on early when things aren’t going well. And that’s why he’s obviously not getting dealt.
But since you’re asking about the hypothetical scenario that he is, a lot would depend on if the reset button is being pushed. If so, then the return is more futures or prospect-based. (Think a recent top-five center, one or two other first-rounders, and a quality prospect or two for good measure.) But if the intention is to accelerate things, then you’re looking at maybe an established top-line center with plenty of team control remaining, plus some other younger NHL-level upgrades. I’m being purposefully vague here as I can’t think of a single established young center who would fit that part of the return that another team would want to move so it doesn’t really matter what the other pieces would be if the core one isn’t there. Either way, it’s clearly not happening.
Gmm8811: In your mind, has Joel Hofer done enough to warrant a two-year extension or has Colten Ellis overtaken him? If Hofer gets offer sheeted, does Armstrong take the draft pick?
Hofer has absolutely done enough to warrant another contract. He has certainly established himself as a legitimate second-string option and there’s a case to be made he should be playing more than he has. It’s worth noting that he’s three years away from unrestricted free agency so a two-year deal would still make him a restricted free agent at the end, albeit one that puts him a year away from hitting the open market. If they’re not ready to commit a long-term deal to him, that term makes sense with an AAV approaching the $3MM range.
The offer sheet is interesting in theory. It’s not a great UFA market for goaltenders so if there’s a team that thinks Husso could be a better long-term option, then an offer sheet would make sense. Again, that’s really only in theory. Let’s look at last year’s offer sheet thresholds, numbers that will only be higher this summer. I can’t see the Blues letting him walk for a second-round pick so that means the offer would need to be higher than at least $4.58MM (which is probably closer to $4.8MM or so this summer) to get them to balk. Is there a team that would him that much on a five-year deal or less? (Anything more than that and the compensation cranks up further with the maximum divisor being five.) I like Hofer but I don’t think there’s a team willing to pay that much money plus a first-round pick and a third-rounder to get his services.
As for Ellis, this is his fourth professional season and the only one in which he hasn’t spent extended time in the ECHL. He’s having a nice year with AHL Springfield for sure but I doubt he’s done enough to make St. Louis management think he’s ready for full-time second-string duty with them. I suspect their plan is to have him as the starter for the Thunderbirds next season pending waivers.
Jakeattack: In your opinion, how much job security does Brunette have with Nashville? Last season, multiple players hit new career highs. This season? Well, everyone knows how this season has gone for multiple reasons.
GBear: Apart from GM Trotz being buddies with Andrew Brunette, can you see any way that Bruno doesn’t get fired at the end of this season?
It certainly has been an ugly year in Nashville, hasn’t it? Even if you expected that the team wouldn’t be as good as the group that went on a massive point streak to go from dead in the water to playoff spot, the thought was that some of their key additions over the summer – Steven Stamkos, Jonathan Marchessault, and Brady Skjei – would at least be enough to offset that, keeping them squarely in the playoff mix. Instead, they’ve already been mathematically eliminated (only one of three teams with that fate) and finishing 30th overall is the probable outcome at this point.
Here’s the question that I’m pondering. Last year was a year where everything went right in the second half and this season has been one where pretty much nothing has gone right. Can that happen two years in a row or are we likely to see a bounce-back from several players? I’m inclined to think it’s the latter which could work in Brunette’s favor.
Brunette is only in his third season as an NHL head coach but even with how things have gone this season, his teams have played to a .587 points percentage which is among the higher numbers among NHL coaches. Looking at it from afar, if Trotz believes in Brunette’s limited track record and thinks that things can’t go so poorly again next year, I could see a scenario where he stays.
There’s also the matter of his contract, which has two years plus an option remaining on it. If Trotz thinks that next season could be another transition type of year where they might not be a playoff contender, the inclination may be to give him another year to see how things go and avoid having two pay two head coaches for two years. And if things don’t go well early next season, they could easily pivot and make the move at that time.
Do I think that Brunette should feel quite secure in his job for next season? No; any time that things go that badly, a coach can’t feel too secure in his future. But honestly, I wouldn’t be shocked if he is back behind the bench next season.
PyramidHeadcrab: What are some notable examples of players that have gone from so-so to nearly elite after being traded to the right team?
I feel like we’ve seen a few examples in recent years, but it’s always fun to think a 3rd liner from Pittsburgh could become a playoff-defining top-liner on, say, Calgary.
I can think of a couple via the trade route but more from other routes. On the trade side, Chandler Stephenson went from a fourth-line depth piece in Washington to a two-time 60-plus-point player in Vegas and while he probably won’t get there this season with Seattle, he’s on pace to surpass 50 at least. The other is Sam Bennett. With Calgary, he showed some flashes of being an impactful power forward but by the end of his time there, he was a third-line winger with a point total in the 20s. Meanwhile, in Florida, Bennett is now a full-time top-six center, notching at least 40 points a season, and is about to become one of the most sought-after players on the open market in July should a pricey extension not be reached by then.
Florida also comes to mind about some of the other routes as well. Carter Verhaeghe was a fourth liner in Tampa Bay, went to the Panthers in free agency, and has a pair of 70-point seasons under his belt since then while becoming a top-six fixture as well. Going back a few years, Marchessault followed a similar path, going from a fourth liner with the Lightning to a 30-goal guy in Florida before being moved to Vegas where he produced even more. If we look at waivers, Gustav Forsling couldn’t crack Carolina’s roster, was claimed off waivers (by Florida, yet again), and has become an all-situations top-pairing player. (If you’re looking for a reason why the Panthers are a consistent contender, finding these under-the-radar gems is a huge part of that.) It looks like Dylan Holloway (offer sheet) should be part of this category as well after going from being a depth piece with Edmonton to a top-50 scorer in St. Louis.
frozenaquatic: Can a coach be fired in the middle of a game? Asking for Laviolette.
I don’t think there’s anything in the rules that says it can’t happen. If a player can be traded mid-game (as Jakob Pelletier was not long ago, for example), a team could make an in-game coaching change. But I wouldn’t expect to see that happen. As for Peter Laviolette’s future with the Rangers, that’ll probably be decided on at the end of the season; it’d be surprising (though not unprecedented) for a team still in the playoff mix to make a coaching change this late in the year.
Photo courtesy of Jeff Curry-Imagn Images.
Thanks for the answer. My argument against Brunette is that outside of the 16-0-2 run they had last season, their record is 60-74-11 under Bruno. That 18 game heater seems to me to be an abberation that has made Bruno look better than he is.
no real Chicago fan is asking to get rid of Bedard.