The Canucks announced they’ve agreed to terms with pending UFA goalie Kevin Lankinen on a five-year, $22.5MM extension. It’ll keep him in Vancouver through the 2029-30 season with a cap hit of $4.5MM. $8.5MM of his total compensation will be paid via signing bonuses, Rick Dhaliwal of CHEK and The Athletic reports. The full breakdown of the deal is as follows, per PuckPedia:
2025-26: $2.5MM base salary, $2.5MM signing bonus, no-move clause
2026-27: $4MM base salary, no-move clause
2027-28: $3MM base salary, $2MM signing bonus, 15-team no-trade clause
2028-29: $2.5MM base salary, $2MM signing bonus, 15-team no-trade clause
2029-30: $2MM base salary, $2MM signing bonus, 15-team no-trade clause
Lankinen, 30 in April, was set to be one of the top options on the open market among goaltenders this summer after the Capitals retained Logan Thompson on a six-year deal. He’s seen a massive jump in market value since his spin on the UFA market last summer when he had to wait until after training camp started to land a one-year, $875K deal in Vancouver.
It’s a testament to the success Lankinen has enjoyed this season with the Canucks, who likely aren’t in postseason position without him. The Finland native had been an above-average backup to Juuse Saros with the Predators for the past two seasons. He was an inconsistent 1B option with the Blackhawks before that, hovering right around league average for his career with a .905 SV% in 112 appearances for Chicago and Nashville from 2020-21 to 2023-24.
Lankinen hasn’t been world-beating in his third NHL stop in Vancouver, but he has shown the ability to keep up solid numbers in extended usage. He’s started 32 of the Canucks’ 55 games amid continued injury woes for 2024 Vezina runner-up Thatcher Demko, on pace to shatter his career-high of 37 set in his rookie season with Chicago. He’s logged a .905 SV% and 2.53 GAA, numbers that look more impressive than in years past, thanks to dwindling league averages, but they’ve also come behind decent team defense. Factoring in his playing environment amid netminders with similar workloads, his performance looks more pedestrian. His 2.58 expected goals against average is the sixth-lowest out of the 48 goalies to play at least 20 games this season, per MoneyPuck. Considering that comparatively easy workload, his 1.6 goals saved above expected only rank 28th out of that 48-player group.
That makes a $4.5MM annual commitment for the rest of the decade look like fair compensation at best and a risky bet at worst. Thanks to a quickly rising salary cap, it should age far better than similarly-priced deals over the past few seasons. Still, Lankinen’s age and broadly consistent play over the past few years means he is what he is – a decent, but not great, option between the pipes who can sniff 40 starts. Considering his AAV is only $500K less than what emerging Kraken starter Joey Daccord landed on his recent extension, there’s undoubtedly a bit of sticker shock when combined with the five-year commitment and extensive trade protection.
He is an acceptable insurance option if Demko’s health continues to pose long-term concerns as he enters the final year of his contract in 2025-26. The two-time All-Star missed the first 24 games of the season with the popliteus muscle injury he sustained in Game 1 of Vancouver’s 2024 postseason run, another two in January with a back injury, and is now listed as week-to-week with a lower-body issue coming out of the 4 Nations Face-Off break. Understandably, his numbers haven’t been great when healthy this season. He’s got a .891 SV% and 2.87 GAA with a 6-6-3 record in 17 appearances, but he’s faced far worse defense than Lankinen and has still managed to save a goal above expected, according to MoneyPuck. On a per-hour basis, Demko has fared slightly better with a 0.064 GSAx/60 compared to Lankinen’s 0.048. However, it’s still a far cry from last year’s elite .918 SV% and 22.0 GSAx.
While it’s a significant commitment to keep Lankinen in British Columbia, it’s a necessary one without many other options in the pipeline as a potential Demko successor. No. 3 option Arturs Silovs was expected to compete for the backup job this year after a strong playoff showing for the Canucks in 2024 but has been borderline unplayable when given the chance, logging a 4.11 GAA and .847 SV% in seven NHL appearances this season. They don’t have any blue-chip prospects in the system between the pipes either, so getting at least some long-term security at the position was understandably a top priority for general manager Patrik Allvin.
Lankinen will be 35 years old when his contract expires, so this will easily be the biggest payday of his career. He’ll be able to test unrestricted free agency in the summer of 2030.
Image courtesy of USA Today Sports.
Yikes!! Lankinen should be 3 years at around 2.75 annually, Honestly, What is Allvin building in Vancouver? It looks like alot of nothing.
I don’t think there are any #1 starters on the free agent market next year, and with Demko health being up in the air, and Lankinen has played really well this year, he had leverage. They don’t have anything in the minors, not sure Silovs is a future NHLer or not, obviously Van thinks not.
Vancouver signing Kevin Lankinen makes sense as one could argue because of Thatcher Demko not being able to stay healthy. Lankinen provides at least overall decent play in net as you could do far worse. Luckily for him, Vancouver’s defensive play helps in covering some of his weaknesses in making him more effective since he isn’t a true #1 goaltender.
So is ~$5 million the going rate for capable NHL backups nowadays? Seems like it. With true star netminders commanding circa ~$10 mill.
I’m sure Florida would like a mulligan on the Bobrovski contract even though they did win a cup
Montreal and Price (Demko comparable with injuries)
Nashville with Saros
Boston with Swayman
I think the ‘mega’ deal for a goalie isn’t worth the risk. Better to have two ‘B’ tier guys that can duke it out
I can see 1a/1b becoming more popular with a more even load split, but top goalies won’t readily accept B-grade money in a contract negotiation, so I don’t see those deals going away..
Welcome to the world of the salary cap going up. I’m sure he took it because of the 5 years. I’m sure they offered 5 years because if the cap goes up like everyone thinks it will be a bargain especially if he plays like a number 1 Goalie. I can see both sides.
Is Demko week to week or year to year?
Career to career.
Comments have nailed the situation pretty clear. So wonder what might be options overseas yet there should be more clarity on Demko and his recovery. Dude has been down a bit
Another former Blackhawk having a solid year.
Shocking!
Never really understood why the Hawks gave up on Lankinen. He looked like a nice piece especially after leading Finland to that World Cup. Good for him.
Probably could have squeaked out a bit more in free agency, as the only starting caliber goaltender available. Canucks couldn’t go into next season with a ? behind Demko. Solid signing.