The NCAA is facing major pressure to lift one of its biggest barriers to entry for men’s ice hockey after a class-action lawsuit was levied against them on Monday, alleging the association is “violating antitrust laws by preventing hockey players who appeared in Canadian Hockey League games from competing for NCAA teams.”
Today, Sean Gentille of The Athletic broke down the potential implications of the suit. The elimination of the rule preventing CHL players from making the jump to Division I hockey has been in discussion for a while, at the very least dating back to a report from Elliotte Friedman of Sportsnet in March.
However, if CHL players were allowed to move to NCAA play at any given time, it would likely necessitate a revision of the NHL’s transfer agreements with both organizations. Players drafted out of the three CHL sub-leagues have a two-year exclusive signing window after being drafted by an NHL club. In contrast, players on the college track have their signing rights stay with their NHL team until Aug. 15, following the year they’ve graduated from their program.
The suit’s basis alleges that the NCAA’s rule barring CHL players from entrance isn’t to protect amateurism. It’s to “harm the CHL — the NCAA’s primary competition for elite young players — and that, in practice, it constitutes a ’group boycott’ that violates U.S. antitrust law. It’s also a ’carve-out’ of sorts that exists in men’s hockey and skiing, but no other sport,” Gentille writes.
Yet removing the rule would severely handicap other high-level junior leagues in North America, such as the USHL and other Canadian junior leagues, who routinely have their players go on to have successful Division I careers. They’d be at greater risk of losing their primary talent to the three CHL leagues. “Avoiding that, along with more generally making changes during what has been a profitable and positive run for college hockey, would seem to be the reason the rule is still on the books in 2024,” Gentille says.
Elsewhere from around the sport:
- The Panthers are looking for undrafted free-agent signing Mikulas Hovorka to take major strides in his development in his first season in North America, AHL head coach Geordie Kinnear told George Richards for NHL.com. “His size is obvious, but his passion to practice and to play is infectious,” Kinnear said. “The coaches just gravitated to him due to his willingness to be coached. He may have been going against teammates and peers, but you could see his physicality, which is how we want him to play. We think he will take a big step, but we also know it is a process.” Hovorka, 23, is a right-shot defenseman who checks in at 6’6″ and nearly 230 lbs. He spent last season in his native Czechia, recording 16 points and a +14 rating in 51 games with Extraliga club Motor Ceske Budejovice.
- Early into his post-playing career, Stars player development coordinator Ben Bishop is already making an impact. The two-time All-Star netminder has been working closely with Dallas 2023 fifth-rounder Arno Tiefensee, he tells NHL.com’s Taylor Baird, traveling to the player’s native Germany to work with him throughout last season. It’s panned out so far, as the 22-year-old took over as the starter for the DEL’s Adler Mannheim last year with a .907 SV% and 2.43 GAA in 32 games. Tiefensee must put pen to paper on an entry-level contract before June 1 of next year before the Stars lose his signing rights.
It would be cool to finally allow CHL players to come over to the NCAA. But It could also create a complete catastrophe for teams with the incredible amount of movement back and forth between each league. Maybe make it a one time allowable transfer rule going from CHL to NCAA. Imagine a guy playing two years in the NCAA to a CHL team for a year and back to NCAA for another. I don’t think that works. There has to be some structure and rules.
The biggest hit would be to Canadian junior A clubs which have done a good job building their “US college feeder” system. I agree with Chip, that some sort of transfer requirement would need to be created, however it would be equally open to challenges in court. Major junior would become the big winner.
This is one time that I agree with the NCAA. Anyone wishing to eventually play college hockey can start out in the USHL, which plenty of kids currently do.
A) You can’t have basketball and football players making millions and then say that playing in the CHL is verboten.
B) The college UFA loophole is, and has always been, total BS. Teams should control NCAA players beyond their eligibility, just as with junior or other players, or else the draft becomes moot.