Senators center Shane Pinto is skating with the team and is expected to make his season debut on Sunday versus Philadelphia after serving his 41-game gambling suspension but before he can do so, he needs to sign a contract first. As Postmedia’s Bruce Garrioch reported in an intermission feature on TSN (video link), the team has presented several different contracts to the restricted free agent.
Many expect that the 23-year-old would sign a contract at or around his previous qualifying offer which checked in at just over $874K over the summer. That would give him time to rebuild his value while giving the Senators, who have been up against the cap ceiling throughout the season when they haven’t been in LTIR, as much flexibility as possible.
But Garrioch notes that Ottawa has proposed a two-year term along with four-, five-, and six-year offers. A two-year bridge agreement was believed to be discussed over the offseason before the suspension was announced; at the time, the price tag for that agreement was believed to be in the low $ 2MM range. Such a move could still be palatable while allowing Ottawa to shift more of the salary into the second season, maximizing Pinto’s compensation while keeping the AAV of the deal lower. While it was under vastly different circumstances, Washington recently took that approach when they signed UFA defenseman Ethan Bear last month.
The longer-term agreements would obviously cost more and in some cases, walk Pinto right to free agency; he is under team control through restricted free agency through the 2027-28 campaign. Speculatively, the price tag for those agreements would push more toward the $5MM range which certainly wouldn’t fit in Ottawa’s salary cap structure. If Pinto is amenable to one of those agreements, there would need to be a cap-clearing move before the contract could be registered.
Despite the various offers on the table, the one-year agreement still seems like the most plausible scenario for both sides. Pinto is coming off a 20-goal campaign but only has 99 career games under his belt so committing to a long-term agreement would come with some risk. A one-year deal still wouldn’t make Pinto arbitration-eligible (he’s two years away as he didn’t accrue a season in 2021-22 due to injuries) but it would allow both sides more time to assess his fit on this roster. They only have a few more days to figure out which route they’ll go if they’re going to get Pinto in the lineup on Sunday.
Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.
pawtucket
I would do everything to give outta town so fast if I was him
Not enough money saved to sign
The gambling bad vibes
Fresh start needed
pawtucket
*get
fleewolfe
Agreed if I was him I would want to leave just cause of the offers before the whole gambling thing though…..as a business Ottawa is gonna try to extract value off a mistake from pinto as an employee pinto should tell them to kick rocks since every sports league makes millions off gambling endorsements then reverses course course on the players…….he isn’t a bad guy just a young kid who broke a dumb rule it’s a lesson learned and move on
MoneyBallJustWorks
the value Ottawa Will extract is in a prorated deal already for this year and the fact he won’t have a full season of production if wanting to go to arb. his best bet is the two year bridge deal at this point
fleewolfe
Completely agree but that prorated deal for this year/arb year will be a lot less now since they will claim wrong doing when they couldn’t even fit him under the cap to start the year so yes he is basically screwed and it’s his fault for not following the rules I just completely hate that they shove it down our throats then hold a higher standard but that’s a story for another day
MoneyBallJustWorks
I get it. it’s the league’s suspension though and I think that is key. The sens will look at this strictly from the “this guy will play less than 40 games so we can only pay him for 40.”
hopefully be has a great 2024-25 to boost his stock again prior to FA
User 318310488
Pinto has no leverage but that being said,Ottawa will find a way to screw it up.
66TheNumberOfTheBest
“Sure, the only thing that can destroy a pro sports league is a gambling scandal making people think the games are fixed BUT I don’t understand why pro sports leagues don’t want their players to gamble.”
layventsky
It’s a slippery slope. They don’t want players betting on themselves or their teams and fixing games as a result.
Inside Out
They are taking quite the gamble offering him more than one year