In a shocking turn of events, the Minnesota Wild have begun the buyout process for both Zach Parise and Ryan Suter. Because they have no-movement causes, they do not need to go through the unconditional waiver process. Both players are on identical 13-year, $98MM contracts that were signed in 2012; a buyout would cause cap penalties of the following for each player:
- 2021-22: $2,371,794
- 2022-23: $6,371,794
- 2023-24: $7,371,794
- 2024-25: $7,371,794
- 2025-26: $833,333
- 2026-27: $833,333
- 2027-28: $833,333
- 2028-29: $833,333
Amazingly, because of the way their contracts were so heavily front-loaded, each player will only receive $6,666,667 in actual salary over the eight years of the buyout. It clears more than $10MM of cap space for the upcoming season, though obviously creates a huge cap penalty in years 2-4 of the buyout.
It’s the end of an era in Minnesota, as Suter and Parise have been the faces of the franchise for nearly a decade. Their signing in 2012 shocked the hockey world, as they decided to go to a relatively new team that had missed the playoffs in eight of its 11 years of existence. When they arrived, things immediately turned positive for Minnesota, reaching the playoffs in each of the next six seasons, but there was very little postseason success. Now, after another disappointing first-round exit, GM Bill Guerin has decided to do what was unthinkable until recently. He released a statement on the move, thanking both players for their contributions:
Zach and Ryan have been an integral part of the Wild’s success over the past nine years and we’ll always be grateful for their many contributions. There were numerous factors that entered into the difficult decision to buy out their contracts, but primarily these moves are a continuation of the transformation of our roster aimed at the eventual goal of winning a Stanley Cup.
Parise, 36, had been pushed almost entirely out of the lineup, dressing only occasionally down the stretch and playing in just four of the team’s seven postseason games. He managed to record three points in those four matches, but had just 18 in his 45 regular season games. His role moving forward was completely unclear, but now he’ll at least get the chance to test the open market. The New York Islanders and GM Lou Lamoriello had been interested in the past, but it remains to be seen whether they’ll pursue the veteran forward this time around.
For Suter, who also turned 36 in January, things are a little different. Though his offensive numbers fell off a cliff this season, recording just 19 points in 56 games, he is still a valuable top-four defenseman that likely could have helped the Wild next season. The key to both buyouts really is that it will open two protection slots in the upcoming expansion draft, which the Wild can use to block Seattle from some of their younger, more valuable assets. Suter and Parise each held a no-movement clause that would have forced Minnesota to protect them in the draft, meaning if this buyout was going to happen, it needed to be done before the protection lists are submitted later this week.
Looking at a cap penalty of nearly $15MM is daunting, but it is important to remember that their regular cap hits would have combined for more than that anyway. If the Wild believe that the two will not be regular contributors in two years, this actually frees up a (small) amount in those seasons as well. Had they waited another year, for instance, there would have been very little cap savings at all, meaning it was a now-or-never situation. The benefit here is opening up more than $10MM (and two expansion slots) at a time when the Wild are looking at key negotiations with Kirill Kaprizov and Kevin Fiala. The team has also been loosely connected to players like Jack Eichel and Sam Reinhart, who could help fill out the center ice position that has been deemed so important to Kaprizov’s future with the team.
That does not mean it’s the end for Parise and Suter, who will enter the free agent market as attractive assets now that they can be had for a much lower cost. Just yesterday, the Edmonton Oilers for instance traded for Duncan Keith, who will likely cost more than Suter receives on the open market. Though he doesn’t have the kind of playoff success that Keith does, there’s certainly going to be a market for the 36-year-old defenseman. Parise’s might be a bit smaller, but remember he is still only a year removed from a 25-goal campaign and has more than 800 points in his NHL career. For a contender looking to add depth to the lineup for a reasonable price, there are worse gambles to make.
Michael Russo of The Athletic broke the news on Twitter.
Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images
puhl
This is going to be controversial, but overall, I think this is a good move for the future. We have some good you players at both positions who need to be playing.
Bloodsport604
Great move for soda
baseballpun
Man that’s a lot of dead cap space coming up.
Goku the Knowledgable One
14 mil in dead cap 3 seasons in a row.. ouch
urban schocker
Tough choices must be made in the flat cap NHL world. LT commitments to reward loyal stars seem to haunt teams. Lessons that will impact future contracts.
Jimmykinglive
Suter is going to be a good cheap pickup for a contender
backhandinbaptist
Ken Holland shoulda just waited
mikedickinson
I’d love seeing him in Carolina.
Stormintazz
“Only receive” $6,666,667
NoRegretzkys
So 23-24…they will have over 14 million in dead money on the books? That’s gonna hurt.
layventsky
Not as much as if they were both traded and retired before their contracts were up. That cap recapture would’ve been a nightmare.
mngophers
Suter’s play is declining as was Parise. Plus they were part of the culture kill there. I can see Moose being an assistant captain now.
jdgoat
This is kind of funny. I remember that free agency day like it was yesterday. I do feel bad for a team like Minnesota having to eat these though. I can’t fault them for attempting to be good and make a splash.
Binks
The cap was different back then. Their hits would’ve been 1 million a year for the last 4 years but the NHL retroactively punished teams who they felt gamed the salary cap. The wild paid most of the money years ago but it wasn’t until after the deals were signed that the cap hits were smoothed out & we knew the last years would be awful to carry 7.5 for players nearing 40.
pawtucket
23-25 they will have cap penalties worth that of an all-star player…aka +$6,000,000 for three seasons?!!
Guess this is addition by subtraction with a lot of addition
Goku the Knowledgable One
each.
Wildwing
I guess they were not hoing to waive their no move clause and Guerin pulled the trigger.
fletch1367
Who was the GM who signed them to those contracts?
Ol' Voodoo
Wasn’t that you, Chuck?
mbundy0330
Chuck Fletcher
Binks
Cap was different in 2012.
Bloodsport604
Simpler times
kingcong95
Can’t do that unless you expect a cap spike soon and a cheaper bridge deal for Kaprizov and Fíala. That’s a lot of dead money.
Nha Trang
They’re sure betting on the cap going up. And I’m not sure that’s a safe bet: the owners lost huge money the last two years.
Well, at least Matt Dumba gets to breathe easier this afternoon.
Jimmykinglive
I understand the owners lost money for a year but with two recent expansions and a mega deal from ESPN, how is the cap projected to be flat for more than one year?
MacJablonski--NotVegasLegend
@Jimmykinglive – As @Dave pointed out recently, expansion fee $$$ don’t go to the cap. It will help very slightly ease the burden of the COVID-caused losses for the owners.
Nha Trang
@ Jimmykinglive: The owners didn’t merely “lose money for a year.” Every Canadian team lost ALL its gate revenues for a year and change: that’s what, a million or two per team per game? The American teams merely lost most of their revenues for much of the season. Toss in the increased COVID related expenses, the shortened schedule, the fans that weren’t in the seats for the playoffs, the degree to which the broadcasters might not have been inclined to pay up for games that weren’t actually played, the loss in concession revenue …
Bottom line is that the league dropped over a billion, certainly, and likely a good bit more than that. You think the owners aren’t going to want to keep expenses down any way they can manage, and for a few years to come?
M34
“Merely”
“lost most of their revenues for much of the season”
“Increased COVID related expenses”
“Shortened schedule”
“Fans that weren’t in the seats”
“Loss in concessioj revenue”
All terms you used. Why is it that Canadian team lost “ALL” and American teams were “merely”??
Either way, the league definitely lost money, sure.. Why would they continue to punish themselves by keeping expenses down when the NFL and (more importantly) NBA continue to grow? Especially when there is a whole new organization to generate revenue?
Melaprise
American teams had MORE fans in the stands and sooner than Canadian teams. Especially during playoffs when the tickets are at a premium.
Nha Trang
@ M34: Eeeesh, were you paying attention at all last season? Why, yes, those were the terms I used. And the reason I used those terms was that the seven Canadian franchises weren’t allowed to have any fans in the stands at all until well into the playoffs, and only a fraction of capacity then. The American teams, by contrast, followed their own state regulations, and some teams had significant capacity allowed not long into the year; *every* American team had at least a quarter capacity with a month to go to the playoffs. Travel expenses were a lot less for the American teams, playing in much smaller bubbles.
And eeeesh twice. Businesses SAVE money by keeping expenses down; there isn’t a business on Earth that would consider that “punishing” themselves.
slslinde
Lots of dead money to pay out! For years to come. They better be able to trade for top center and extend Kaprizov. Long term
66TheNumberOfTheBest
“Sometimes the best moves…”
Ray Shero tried hard to bring both of them to Pittsburgh. I think the Pens were the runners up in that sweepstakes IIRC. Whew.
Suter seems like a future Bruin or Ranger.
Parise a future Isle or once again Devil.
TJECK109
I can remember the summer of the “Parise Watch” in Pittsburgh. No one will ever know how these 2 would have worked in Pittsburgh but they had death trap contracts that would have made it that much harder for this team to try to retool on the fly like they are trying now
Goku the Knowledgable One
Think Parise would be worth it on a 1year Deal?
Seems like he washed out, but could replace zuck for a year if he gets shop lifted by kraken
Goku the Knowledgable One
Corey perry really bounced back his career. Not sure what the issue is with ZP , but dude has skills and its a slow burn in the NHL
J.H.
One or both of these players will end up with one of these teams: Bruins, Canes, Leafs, Bolts, Avs, or Islanders. Book it.
TJECK109
How the bolts?
J.H.
With a signed contract.
backhandinbaptist
@TJECK109 on IR
pawtucket
Both sign cheap deals for the Avs and chase a cup. Selanne and Karya
Goku the Knowledgable One
remember how well that worked out …
FearTheWilson
I hope they both sign with the same team….. part 2.
EJesus98
They should sign somewhere together, again, for the memes. Somewhere like San Jose or LA. Cause why not?
sweetg
I thought this might happen with Parise but not suter . They asked him to waive no movem e t he said no. decided time to move on. he will be signed somewhere if wants to move.
Gbear
Hard to think of a team that would sign both of them. Maybe the Devils?
Donovan Voigt
Nashville could use these 2 of the price is right… they have the cap space it’s just how much do these 2 want
Nha Trang
No idea how much they want, but any GM offering them more than $2 million has rocks in his head, and you can get younger players with that level of production for that $.
I wonder — can teams re-sign players they’ve bought out?
MacJablonski--NotVegasLegend
@Nha Trang – CGY did it with Michael Stone, and he was even more productive! I don’t like to see teams doing that, though…
Gbear
Preds need to unload a Dman before the expansion draft and I’m not sure Parise is the answer to their scoring woes. Pass on this.
Melaprise
If I remember correctly, they cannot re-sign players that were bought out as it would constitute cap circumvention. Might be able to trade for them after they’ve signed with a new team; Not sure. Please correct me if anyone knows the answer.
Nha Trang
Yep, be interesting where they land. Can teams resign players they buy out?
kingsfan1968
Suter to the Kings!
delete my account please
As I predicted at the time they signed, neither guy made it to the 13th year of their contract.
Melaprise
WOW !!! I never thought we would see ANY team buy-out TWO players at that price; especially considering they are both very serviceable (although over-paid). That’s going to hurt the owners and the team’s cap for a few years. I can’t believe they couldn’t/wouldn’t work out a trade with either of them. Stark reminder that hockey truly is “Just a business”.
Nha Trang
What GM that didn’t want to be unemployed the day after would trade for a player in decline toting a $7.5 million cap hit for four more years? I think the best that Suter can get right now is (say) $2.5 million for two years. Parise won’t get that much, not with Jason Spezza signing for $900K after a decent year.
But yeah, that’s a startling buyout, and a major admission of failure.
Col. Taylor
While I do applaud the wild for going for it in 2012, all they need to do is change their name to the Fighting Saints.