Will College Hockey Players Earn An Extra Year Of Eligibility?

Few groups have been hit harder by the COVID-19 pandemic than college athletes. The NCAA announced on Thursday that all 2020 winter and spring championships have been canceled, effectively ending college sports for the year. While the decision did not specifically ban conferences from continuing to host postseason tournaments for winter sports and regular season games and tournaments for spring sports, all winter tournaments have been canceled nonetheless and the vast majority of conferences have canceled all practice and competition for the year.

While obviously the proper decision was made in regards to public safety, student-athletes who work year-round to play a relatively short college season have lost their chance at a championship and in many cases the majority of their regular season as well. This is particularly hard on seniors competing in their final season. To make matters worse, college athletes typically have just four seasons and five years to participate in NCAA athletics, and the possibility that this year would be lost entirely had students around the country reeling. To remedy the situation, the NCAA was quick to announce that eligibility relief will be available for spring sports athletes, extending their playing opportunities by another year.

However, the NCAA also made mention that they “will also discuss issues related to seasons of competition for winter sport student-athletes who were unable to participate in conference and NCAA championships.” So could college hockey players also receive an additional year added to their eligibility? The case against this idea is that the vast majority of the season had already been completed, with most conference tournaments already underway by the time of this announcement. However, the statement alluded to the opportunity only being available to the athletes whose teams were still competing in conference tournaments or expected to earn an NCAA Tournament berth.

At the time the decision to cancel all college athletics competition occurred, 40 programs were still competing in conference tournaments and technically all had an equal chance at winning their respective conference and an automatic berth into the national tourney. If the NCAA decides to grant waivers for an extra year of eligibility for winter athletes, they could choose to grant that aid to hockey players on all of these rosters.

The alternative option, one being championed by men’s basketball coaches around the country, is to instead name the teams that would have been selected to the national tournament based on conference standings and national rankings. Some quick “bracketology” using the Pairwise rankings would produce the following list of teams whose players could qualify for an additional year of eligibility under this model:

No. 1 North Dakota – NCHC regular season champion
No. 2 Minnesota State – WCHA regular season champion
No. 3 Cornell – ECAC regular season champion
No. 4 Minnesota-Duluth
No. 5 Denver
No. 6 Boston College – Hockey East regular season champion
No. 7 Penn State – Big Ten regular season champion
No. 8 UMass
No. 9 Clarkson
No. 10 Ohio State
No. 11 UMass Lowell
No. 12 Bemidji State
No. 13 Arizona State
No. 14 Michigan
No. 15 Maine
No. 26 American International – Atlantic Hockey regular season champion

The problem with this process is that the actual NCAA Tournament field likely would have had some slight differences from the final standings and rankings. The Atlantic tournament for instance is often a crap shoot, while skilled teams that underachieved in the regular season, such as Boston University, Harvard, and Minnesota, could have made a run in their respective tournaments. It could be deemed as unfair to select the field without the usual basis of complete tournaments and a final ranking.

It remains to be seen whether winter college athletes will receive eligibility relief at all and by what means the NCAA chooses to award that relief. For now, student-athletes and fans alike will have to appreciate that they got to enjoy a full regular season and will look forward to a return to action next year. Whether or not that return includes some seniors who otherwise would have ended their college careers this year will be the major question.