Trade rumors seem to be buzzing around the Tampa Bay Lightning as a team very likely to make a big deal at the trade deadline this year. Already with the best record in the NHL with a 36-13-3 record, the Lightning might be looking to improve both its forward depth as well as its defense for a run at the Stanley Cup this year.
While he is quick to acknowledge that teams cross-scouting each other doesn’t mean a trade is forthcoming, New York Post’s Larry Brooks writes that he wouldn’t be surprised if both teams are scouting each other for a potential deadline deal surrounding New York Rangers defenseman Ryan McDonagh. The fact that Rangers assistant general manager Chris Drury was spotted at a Syracuse Crunch game (Tampa’s AHL affiliate) on Friday, suggests they might be looking at what they can get from the Lightning in such a move. Tampa Bay’s assistant GM Pat Verbeek has also been spotted at Ranger games recently. McDonagh has often been mentioned in trade rumors as he has one year remaining on his contract after this year, making him a more advantageous acquisition than a pure rental player.
The Lightning might be looking to bolster their defense. The team struggled when they lost Victor Hedman for several weeks to injury. Considering that Tampa Bay likes former Ranger players such as Ryan Callahan and Dan Girardi, perhaps a trade is a possibility. Brooks added that he believes the Rangers would also be willing to retain half of his $4.7MM salary in order to get a quality return.
- In the same article, Brooks adds he believes the New York Rangers also would be willing to retain half of veteran forward Rick Nash’s contract as well. Nash, who is in the final year of his deal with an AAV of $7.8MM, is believed to have multiple suitors if the price is right, including the Nashville Predators, Columbus Blue Jackets, Dallas Stars, St. Louis Blues, San Jose Sharks and possibly the Pittsburgh Penguins.
- The Boston Globe’s Fluto Shinzawa writes that the Boston Bruins would also have quite a bit of interest in acquiring McDonagh for their defense. The scribe writes that the veteran’s leadership, character and performance could be quite valuable to a young Bruins’ team. However, would the Bruins be willing to relinquish a first-rounder, a young NHL player and a prospect for him?
- The Ottawa Sun’s Bruce Garrioch reports that the Ottawa Senators might be getting back forward Mark Stone from injury soon, after having already missed six games due to a knee injury. Although not expected to play today against Montreal, Garrioch writes that Stone has resumed skating and is a possibility for Tuesday’s game against the New Jersey Devils. “I have to find out if it swelled up again,” Senators head coach Guy Boucher said Saturday. “There’s no structural problem waiting to heal. It’s the swelling. Once the swelling is gone, then he’s ready to play. I know the swelling was down big time. Mechanically he was able to move his leg a lot better, but certainly not enough to play (this weekend), and he hasn’t practised yet. He has to do real practices with the team, and then he’s ready to play. I’d love to get him back, but we’ve lived with this all year.”
worzelmangel
Would be very hard to see McDonagh traded. Gorton would have to absolutely ace that trade and I don’t think I trust him to do that after what he got back for Stepan (and Raanta).
acarneglia
I think the rangers did very well in that trade. Got a promising young player and possibly a top 4 d man
JT19
The Rangers picked up a top 10 pick for them. Raanta was going to leave in a year anyway as the Rangers would’ve been unable to resign him and Stepan wasn’t playing at a level equal to his salary. The Rangers were also in a clear retool/rebuild phase so moving salary out for prospects is what you’re supposed to do. He got a good haul. I doubt they would’ve been able to get much more. Arizona was desperate for a starting goaltender and veteran top six center.
Kenleyfornia74
The #7 pick and Deangelo was a good return
MZ311
They got the number 7 overall pick
Connorsoxfan
Does Seneshyn or however you spell it plus a first, a ‘19 3rd, and a conditional pick for Mcdonaugh and Nash both on retained salary make any sense?
corey3miller
Not don’t think they would want to give up McDonaugh and Nash in the same deal and the return is not good enough
bheath33
At this point Bruins dont really need Mcdonagh considering the cost. They need someone to deepen the scoring threat up front. But they play as a team so might be best to let them roll. They are a year early to really go for it.